Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snopes Scrubs Article On Obama's Mama's Picture-Porn: Excluded From Wayback Machine (Marcy Moore/s)
BirtherReport.com ^ | June 16, 2012 | Unattributed

Posted on 06/16/2012 6:37:09 PM PDT by Seizethecarp

It appears Snopes.com scrubbed their "report" on Obama's mom posing nude. When Snopes originally published their article they tagged the claim "undetermined" and then sometime later tagged it as "false" claiming the nude woman in the photos was Marcy Moore. Now Snopes pulled the article altogether and had the URL excluded from the Wayback Machine. Wonder why?

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: achillwind; anndunham; coverup; culturewar; downthememoryhole; frankmarshalldavis; marcymoore; movealong; naturalborncitizen; nothingtoseehere; obama; obamasmama; obamatruthfile; obamunism; porn; pornification; pravdamedia; purge; revisionisthistory; snopesbias; stalinisttactics; stanleyanndunham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: muir_redwoods
We can get nekkid pictures of his mama but we can’t get his college records, amazing.

That puts things in perspective! As coups go, so far ours is kinda embarrassing.

I keep wondering are we fed up enough yet??? Must be getting close to the tipping point, one way or another.

41 posted on 06/17/2012 6:21:25 AM PDT by GBA (To understand what is happening to America and why, read The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

“because snopes is just some liberal couple in an apt somewhere. I don’t know how they became the alleged internet rumor “experts”.....”

Exactly. They’re BS cover up artists.


42 posted on 06/17/2012 6:32:41 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Take heart. This is a huge victory. Snopes is run by a pair of the biggest Obama-smooching Obots on the Net. Ever since these pics first surfaced, Snopes has been mocking anyone who dared suggest they were of Stanley Ann, or Ann Dunham, as she preferred to be called. [Anna was her nickname, according to her friends.] For Snopes to pull their article is akin to Al Gore admitted warming hasn't occurred for the past 12 yrs or so. It's big.

The war won't be won w any single battle. But finally, w the entrance of Arpaio into the fray, we are racking up an ever increasing number of victories.

And don't forget the most crucial part. Whenever part of his cover-up falls, BHO becomes angrier and more defensive. Mere subjects are not supposed to pick away at the Emperor/Malignant Narcissist's fairytale nativity story. The more they do, the more anger BHO has to manage. And he is notoriously bad at managing his anger.

43 posted on 06/17/2012 6:33:11 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I think we are in agreement.
The released pics do not support the 0bama story, per 0bama’s two books.
The pics point to a different, untold story.


44 posted on 06/17/2012 6:45:24 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

Don’t Trust Snopes

good article here

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/swank/090313


45 posted on 06/17/2012 6:47:00 AM PDT by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eartrumpet

snopes is a propaganda outlet.

They have been proven wrong so many times, the only ones that believe then are Obamatards swelling the fool-aide.


46 posted on 06/17/2012 7:33:43 AM PDT by HHawk86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2896144/posts?page=7#7


47 posted on 06/17/2012 7:49:05 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

“Wonder why?”

It seems fairly simple. Snopes says:

“The article you have attempted to access is temporarily unavailable because Internet filters have flagged it as containing material deemed to be pornographic or sexually explicit and have blocked access to our site on that basis. We are attempting to resolve the issue and get the material back online as soon as we can.”

ORYR says:

“The notice claims it has been flagged as containing material deemed to be pornographic, however, a simple search using Snopes’ search engine finds nothing using multiple keywords pertaining to Obama’s mom. Try it yourself; http://snopes.com";

I did just that using the keyword Dunham and got 7 articles referencing her.

Seems like ORYR are jumping to conclusions.


48 posted on 06/17/2012 9:05:22 AM PDT by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
I agree with you. We are headed for something spectacular.

Most are only aware of the end, when it all comes apart, but what I find more interesting is the story, watching the buildup, the cascade of incidents and events, the thousands of cuts, the many handfuls piled on that all leads to that final straw.

I thought we'd see it happen with Clinton, but I misunderestimated his emotional intelligence and personality skills, not to mention his mentoring. He had the skills and lifelong experience to navigate the troubles he got himself into.

obama is a different sort of political animal, without the emotional intelligence and personality of a Bill Clinton.

His mentoring wasn't American Dixie mafia with a respect for traditions and his elders, but rather the ultra radical left's hatred, sweetened with an appreciation for an African dictator's finesse.

Clinton made friends or at least made us amused, but we have the exact opposite with obama, so it's somewhat amazing obama has gotten this far.

None the less, his part in their coup is about to come to and end and I'll be somewhat surprised if obama is on the ballot in November.

His future in politics is over. I just hope he doesn't get a lot of people killed on the way down and out.

49 posted on 06/17/2012 9:07:12 AM PDT by GBA (To understand what is happening to America and why, read The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
We can get nekkid pictures of his mama but we can’t get his college records, amazing.

and there it is...

50 posted on 06/17/2012 9:07:49 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GBA

I agree with you that barry the bastard commie is not going to be the democrap nominee in November. I also do not believe the dried out, worn out, over the hill ary will be the nominee. But I would be interested in your take on whom the criminal enterprise party will place ont he ballot as close tot he last minute as they can manage it. CAre yo share your thoughts on that?


51 posted on 06/17/2012 9:11:25 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GBA

I agree with you that barry the bastard commie is not going to be the democrap nominee in November. I also do not believe the dried out, worn out, over the hill ary will be the nominee. But I would be interested in your take on whom the criminal enterprise party will place on the ballot as close to the last minute as they can manage it. Care to share your thoughts on that?


52 posted on 06/17/2012 9:12:01 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: theKid51; Apple Blossom

post #15


53 posted on 06/17/2012 9:16:10 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Romney - not Obama - not a Conservative - not a real Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

Do you have any proof of that? I know quite a few people who use that site as a gospel for political truth.


54 posted on 06/17/2012 9:24:31 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (Cogito Ergo Doleo Soetoro, ABO and of course FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
I have one word for you, DL: vindication. I hope some of those who mocked you for making this point even pre-Gilberts will be decent enough to apologize. If Snopes is in full retreat, you know the jig is up.

That is indeed welcome news! I figured those commie ratbastards at Snopes would just keep riding that lie, but I guess they do have a point at which the humiliation is just too much even for them! :)

I suppose it would be beyond them to put an apology on their web page to all the people they Intentionally mislead for that entire period of time they were trying to force that "Marcy Moore" lie on everyone? I guess they just couldn't, and did not want to believe that the President's Mother was actually photographed naked, and as it turns out for Porno-graphical purposes! It's just too much shame for a Democrat to bear! :) They went to new lows for the Gutter Trash Clintons, and now this?

Anyways, thanks for letting me know about this!

55 posted on 06/17/2012 9:27:52 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

It looks like her and fits right in with the frank marshall davis narrative.


56 posted on 06/17/2012 9:29:05 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (Cogito Ergo Doleo Soetoro, ABO and of course FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6
I am not convinced the photos are SAD. The nose appears different.

The nose may appear different because you are looking at it from different angles. 3 dimensional geometry projected onto a two dimensional plane (i.e. a photograph) does not readily transmit the three dimensional information needed to judge it easily unless the differences are stark.

I have long said that the crooked tooth (upper left lateral incisor) in her mouth proves the woman is Stanley Ann.

57 posted on 06/17/2012 9:33:30 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Boiling point

Really? I’d never heard/read that about the pics...it would be enough to convince me 100% that FMD was the father. Well, in addition to Davis’ pedophile porn autobiography and Obummers sick poem “Pops”.


58 posted on 06/17/2012 9:39:40 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (Cogito Ergo Doleo Soetoro, ABO and of course FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
An excellent question. The demonrats have no bench other than Hillary, so the obvious bet would be Hillary.

She's a true believer, the forceful progressive woman behind the affable Dixicrat man, and she's been a very busy Queen bee flittering around the world. One can only imagine what cards she has played here and there.

The demonrats will have to adjust to the damage that obama has done, but I'm still not convinced that Mitt isn't the progressive's replacement for obama. That's how they play this game.

As far as who the demonrat party runs? Where does the power lie? Who gets to make the call? Whose turn is it?

If they do run obama, Mitt is the next progressive president of the USofA. If they run anyone else other than Biden, Mitt is this election's rino also ran runner up.

59 posted on 06/17/2012 9:40:31 AM PDT by GBA (To understand what is happening to America and why, read The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
What is there in the photos that indicates the year they were taken.

There are two Jazz album covers (Nat King Cole and Cuban Fire) that prove they were taken after 1958. Apart from that, Stanley Ann was not in Hawaii until 1960, so that establishes them as no earlier than that.

They could have been taken later, such as 1962-1965, but they could very well be from 1960. She doesn't appear to have stretch marks (not that this is certain proof) so I am guessing 1960 until someone shows a better reason to think it was a later date.

The tooth gives it away.

60 posted on 06/17/2012 9:41:14 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson