Posted on 06/16/2012 6:37:09 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It appears Snopes.com scrubbed their "report" on Obama's mom posing nude. When Snopes originally published their article they tagged the claim "undetermined" and then sometime later tagged it as "false" claiming the nude woman in the photos was Marcy Moore. Now Snopes pulled the article altogether and had the URL excluded from the Wayback Machine. Wonder why?
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
That puts things in perspective! As coups go, so far ours is kinda embarrassing.
I keep wondering are we fed up enough yet??? Must be getting close to the tipping point, one way or another.
“because snopes is just some liberal couple in an apt somewhere. I dont know how they became the alleged internet rumor experts.....”
Exactly. They’re BS cover up artists.
The war won't be won w any single battle. But finally, w the entrance of Arpaio into the fray, we are racking up an ever increasing number of victories.
And don't forget the most crucial part. Whenever part of his cover-up falls, BHO becomes angrier and more defensive. Mere subjects are not supposed to pick away at the Emperor/Malignant Narcissist's fairytale nativity story. The more they do, the more anger BHO has to manage. And he is notoriously bad at managing his anger.
I think we are in agreement.
The released pics do not support the 0bama story, per 0bama’s two books.
The pics point to a different, untold story.
snopes is a propaganda outlet.
They have been proven wrong so many times, the only ones that believe then are Obamatards swelling the fool-aide.
“Wonder why?”
It seems fairly simple. Snopes says:
“The article you have attempted to access is temporarily unavailable because Internet filters have flagged it as containing material deemed to be pornographic or sexually explicit and have blocked access to our site on that basis. We are attempting to resolve the issue and get the material back online as soon as we can.”
ORYR says:
“The notice claims it has been flagged as containing material deemed to be pornographic, however, a simple search using Snopes’ search engine finds nothing using multiple keywords pertaining to Obama’s mom. Try it yourself; http://snopes.com"
I did just that using the keyword Dunham and got 7 articles referencing her.
Seems like ORYR are jumping to conclusions.
Most are only aware of the end, when it all comes apart, but what I find more interesting is the story, watching the buildup, the cascade of incidents and events, the thousands of cuts, the many handfuls piled on that all leads to that final straw.
I thought we'd see it happen with Clinton, but I misunderestimated his emotional intelligence and personality skills, not to mention his mentoring. He had the skills and lifelong experience to navigate the troubles he got himself into.
obama is a different sort of political animal, without the emotional intelligence and personality of a Bill Clinton.
His mentoring wasn't American Dixie mafia with a respect for traditions and his elders, but rather the ultra radical left's hatred, sweetened with an appreciation for an African dictator's finesse.
Clinton made friends or at least made us amused, but we have the exact opposite with obama, so it's somewhat amazing obama has gotten this far.
None the less, his part in their coup is about to come to and end and I'll be somewhat surprised if obama is on the ballot in November.
His future in politics is over. I just hope he doesn't get a lot of people killed on the way down and out.
and there it is...
I agree with you that barry the bastard commie is not going to be the democrap nominee in November. I also do not believe the dried out, worn out, over the hill ary will be the nominee. But I would be interested in your take on whom the criminal enterprise party will place ont he ballot as close tot he last minute as they can manage it. CAre yo share your thoughts on that?
I agree with you that barry the bastard commie is not going to be the democrap nominee in November. I also do not believe the dried out, worn out, over the hill ary will be the nominee. But I would be interested in your take on whom the criminal enterprise party will place on the ballot as close to the last minute as they can manage it. Care to share your thoughts on that?
post #15
Do you have any proof of that? I know quite a few people who use that site as a gospel for political truth.
That is indeed welcome news! I figured those commie ratbastards at Snopes would just keep riding that lie, but I guess they do have a point at which the humiliation is just too much even for them! :)
I suppose it would be beyond them to put an apology on their web page to all the people they Intentionally mislead for that entire period of time they were trying to force that "Marcy Moore" lie on everyone? I guess they just couldn't, and did not want to believe that the President's Mother was actually photographed naked, and as it turns out for Porno-graphical purposes! It's just too much shame for a Democrat to bear! :) They went to new lows for the Gutter Trash Clintons, and now this?
Anyways, thanks for letting me know about this!
It looks like her and fits right in with the frank marshall davis narrative.
The nose may appear different because you are looking at it from different angles. 3 dimensional geometry projected onto a two dimensional plane (i.e. a photograph) does not readily transmit the three dimensional information needed to judge it easily unless the differences are stark.
I have long said that the crooked tooth (upper left lateral incisor) in her mouth proves the woman is Stanley Ann.
Really? I’d never heard/read that about the pics...it would be enough to convince me 100% that FMD was the father. Well, in addition to Davis’ pedophile porn autobiography and Obummers sick poem “Pops”.
She's a true believer, the forceful progressive woman behind the affable Dixicrat man, and she's been a very busy Queen bee flittering around the world. One can only imagine what cards she has played here and there.
The demonrats will have to adjust to the damage that obama has done, but I'm still not convinced that Mitt isn't the progressive's replacement for obama. That's how they play this game.
As far as who the demonrat party runs? Where does the power lie? Who gets to make the call? Whose turn is it?
If they do run obama, Mitt is the next progressive president of the USofA. If they run anyone else other than Biden, Mitt is this election's rino also ran runner up.
There are two Jazz album covers (Nat King Cole and Cuban Fire) that prove they were taken after 1958. Apart from that, Stanley Ann was not in Hawaii until 1960, so that establishes them as no earlier than that.
They could have been taken later, such as 1962-1965, but they could very well be from 1960. She doesn't appear to have stretch marks (not that this is certain proof) so I am guessing 1960 until someone shows a better reason to think it was a later date.
The tooth gives it away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.