[so_real]

Obama has NO intention of throwing the election to Romney.

Blatantly advancing the homosexual agenda, publicly expressing climate change to be priority one for the next term, and picking a fight with Catholics -- five months before the election -- in your opinion is not attempting to throw it? No one is that dumb. Not even Obama, and certainly not the marketing team he's used to get this far. He is systematically divesting himself of the large voting blocks.

If I called the shots for the other team, I'd direct Obama to toss this election. Heck, I'd split the vote using Clinton if I had to in order to get the job done. (And Romney is such a weak candidate that just might become necessary.) It's a reasonable gambit for a group bent on scuttling the advances conservatism has recently made. The move has no downside. If you were pulling the strings, what would be the downside of having Romney pickup where Obama leaves off for four years? What would be the upside? This is chess and they are making a brilliant move.

[arrogantsob]

Obama is an ideologue and to him the fact that he got where he is means that he believes more are followers of his ideals than not.

And I have seen no evidence that he is smart in any way.

There is nothing they can do about the colossal failure of this administration. It is clear that the voters want nothing more to do with this party or this clown. He can’t throw an election that is already lost. Nor is there anyone that can “direct” him to do so.