Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: daisy mae for the usa
I take it that you cannot answer mine.

We are electing a President not a PriestKing.

Who do you think has the power to determine what natural law is?

Why do you think Reagan never outlawed abortion?

543 posted on 06/16/2012 4:59:50 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

“We are electing a President not a PriestKing.”

Please spare me the drama. It is so...yesterday.

You said you could speak for yourself, and yet you aren’t.

Question: Is abortion murder, yes or no?

Question: Which law would you feel more comfortable putting your life in the hands of— the law of the land, or Nature’s Law?

Question: Are you familiar with Pharisees?

Now to answer your questions:

“Who do you think has the power to determine what natural law is?”

Nature’s God, the Creator, I AM.

“Why do you think Reagan never outlawed abortion?”

How could I possibly know? I cannot live in another person’s mind.

Now there, I was the bigger person, and went first. Your turn. Answer my questions.


545 posted on 06/16/2012 5:22:30 PM PDT by daisy mae for the usa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream; daisy mae for the usa; BlackElk; joanie-f; Steve Schulin; Gelato; Colonel_Flagg; ...
Who do you think has the power to determine what natural law is?

All of us.

It's self-evident, or, to put it in the modern vernacular, as plain as the nose on your face.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men..."


"Every word employed in the Constitution is to be expounded in its plain, obvious, and common sense, unless the context furnishes some ground to control, qualify, or enlarge it. Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, rounded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings. The people make them, the people adopt them, the people must be supposed to read them, with the help of common-sense, and cannot be presumed to admit in them any recondite meaning or any extraordinary gloss."

-- Joseph Story, Constitution (5th ed.) 345, SS 451.


563 posted on 06/21/2012 6:53:50 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (TomHoefling.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson