Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
Please show me where the ‘primary’ purpose is defined.

How many times do I have to show you?

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men..."

-- The Declaration of Independence

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

-- The Preamble, or Statement of Purpose, of the United States Constitution

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

-- The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

-- The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Constitution limits the office of the President to enforcing current laws.

The Constitution of the United States is not only current, it is supreme.

It doesn’t allow making up his own and creating a military dictatorship.

So how is it that the fulfilling of the primary purpose of American government, the protection of the God-given, unalienable rights of the people, constitutes a "military dictatorship"?

So go read the Constitution.

You might want to take your own advice, since to date, neither you or your fellow critics seem to pay any mind to the Constitution's clear words that I've posted all over this thread.

484 posted on 06/12/2012 3:25:54 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

Unfortunately, under the law babies in the womb are not considered persons. Therefor your entire argument is useless. There are other sections to the Constitution besides the preamble. There are also tens of thousands of pages of laws and a couple hundred years of court decisions which impact the meaning of most every word in the Constitution.

The courts have wrongly decided to make abortion legal. That is a fact and its law. If you ignore that law and attempt to use the military to enforce your version of law then you are a wanna be tin pot dictator.

But none of this matters because you have no chance to become elected and if you did you would be impeached the minute you tried to do something like this. Your entire premise is devoid of reality.

Why don’t you spend your time and efforts actually making a difference on the abortion issue? As it is you are simply using this issue as an attempt to further your own personal agenda.

You won’t though, because you don’t get it and probably never will. You have displayed a shocking disregard for the rule of law and a complete ignorance of the Constitution and the Government of this great Republic.


485 posted on 06/12/2012 3:38:22 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson