The Constitution requires equal protection for the right to life of every person, not “reduced” numbers of immoral, unconstitutional killings.
And the idea that you reduce the numbers of those being butchered by giving up every decent moral, constitutional and legal argument against the killing has always been a cruel farce anyhow.
“The Constitution requires equal protection for the right to life of every person, not “reduced” numbers of immoral, unconstitutional killings.”
The Constitution requires a lot of things. For example it requires the courts to interpret the law and the President to enforce the law.
“And the idea that you reduce the numbers of those being butchered by giving up every decent moral, constitutional and legal argument against the killing has always been a cruel farce anyhow.”
Only in the twilight zone. If a law is passed which reduces the number of abortions by 10,000,000 then you’ve saved 10,000,000 lives.
Incremental change can work both ways if you use it. Trying to hit a home run every single time you’re at bat is a sure way to lose the game.