Yes you are telling lies. Now stop.
Abortion is always wrong. The idea that it might be necessary for the mothers health is a myth. A Congressman who is also a OB/GYN stated on the floor he has never seen that in over 20 years of practice.
That you use that example speaks to your true beliefs.
You claimed that Ronald Reagan had been pro-abortion once just like your man Mitt Romney, who labeled Reagan as “adamantly pro-choice” and spread that lie for months.
Mitt Romney was one of the more effective defenders of abortion for many years in the 90s and 2000s, he gave impassioned personal testimony to the importance of protecting abortion rights and he fund raised for Planned Parenthood. This pro-abortion activism was after RoevWade, after years and decades of the great abortion wars, it was after President Reagan and the 1994 revolution even the Clinton years, even after the first Bush term, it only ended in 2006 to run nationally.
Show us Reagan’s words and video showing that he claimed to be pro abortion or “adamantly pro-choice” as that scum bag Mitt Romney (and his supporters) have slandered him with for years, severely damaging the dead Ronald Reagan’s reputation forever.
Where are the quotes, the speeches, the agenda?
I've told no lies. That you appear to reject the “hard cases” is commendable. I do, too. You, me, and maybe about 20% of everyone else.
But over half of folks view themselves as pro-life, and about 60% of folks would ban abortion entirely... Except in the hard cases - rape, incest, life of the mother.
As these cases represent only a few percent of abortions (and virtually none in the case of life of the mother), I'd be happy to take that compromise now, looking for the “whole loaf” some time down the road.
But for now, most pro-lifers would be offended if you called them pro-abort because they buy the exceptions for “hard cases.”
And they would be right. Folks who are opposed to 96+% of abortions aren't pro-abort.
sitetest