Absolutely not.
1. He's likely a neutral on abortion, meaning he won't push it like Bambi does, but I agree he likely won't actively work against it, and I don't like that. That's a huge difference.
2. He's now way pro-Marxist, that's an ignorant statement.
3. I don't know what he will do about Obamacare, he claims he will work to end it, I don't really trust him, but believe he can be pushed. Bambi can't.
4. I don't entirely trust him on judges, but I know Bambi will give us another Kagan, or Sotamayor, or Ginsberg, that's a fact.
5. Romney is a mix on environmentalism, he's not a radical wanting to take out our fuels and our capacity to be industrial. We know what Bambi is.
6. He's not pro-Muzzie at all, period, that's laughable.
7. He's not anti-free enterprise, that's laughable.
8. He's naive and ignorant about the gay movement, but he's not pro-gay. Bambi is 100%.
9. Divisive, yep, he is, but doesn't hold a candle to the one. Destructive? I doubt it, there is no way he appoints people in his administration as bad as Bambi, he may lean left in some things, but I'm sorry, it's almost night and day.
I like Dante's take on that.
“The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.”
This isn't pro-homosexual?
"For some voters it might be enough for me to simply match my opponent’s record in this area. But I believe we can and must do better. If we are to achieve the goals we share, we must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern. My opponent cannot do this. I can and will."
"One issue I want to clarify concerns President Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue” military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction. I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation’s military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share."
So now you will post something about him that you know is a lie, and you won't respond to anything refuting it?