[Principled]

well, at least they’ll have voted for someone pure.

so what if we end up w/ obama again?

[netmilsmom]

>>so what if we end up w/ obama again?<<

[Finny]

"Pure" -- what are you talking? As if refusing to vote for a guy with a record of ADVANCING the FIVE major liberal agendas of global warming, nationalized health care, abortion, activist judges, and the gay agenda is mere quibbling with the concept of "purity."

ABO is focused so exclusively on the "Great and Powerful Oz" it purports to vote against, that it fails to seriously ponder the devil it's on the verge of voting FOR.

THAT kind of desperate mistake is jumping from the frying pan into the fire. The ALTERNATIVE is to use your presidential vote to, in essence, turn down the fire instead of leaping from pan to flame. Voting third party to weaken the winner's mandate is thinking about what you're voting for AND what you're voting against. ABO is considering only half the equation, and therefore only half the consequences.