No. Voting for this person is not turning down the fire. Do you really intend to say that reelecting obama is turning down the fire?! Put the bong down man.
You erroneously assert that there is no downside to reelecting obama. Unless you also assert that this nobody can win [which you have not] then you're simply voting for the nonromney. Sorry, in this context, that's just stupid.
The president will be either Obama or Romney. What you're saying is that it's better to reelect obama than vote for romney.
If that's you, you're part of the problem.
I don’t think you will get through to these people. Last time I saw someone post your argument of choosing between Obama or Romney, this was the reply.
*************************************
No, we want them both to lose. Badly. An absolutely humiliating defeat for them both...
47 posted on Saturday, June 09, 2012 4:39:31 PM by so_real
Romney will be nominally pro life. Obama is a disciple of Singer. There is no question that on this issue Romney will get the unborn baby vote.
Sadly, barring a miracle, you are correct.
THEREFORE the next president will be an anti-conservative statist.
My vote cannot stop an anti-conservative from taking the presidency. However, it CAN contribute toward weakening the mandate of that anti-conservative.
If you are voting to give an anti-conservative a mandate, YOU, my FRiend, are part of the problem.