Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
Illegal orders

How is enforcing the most important, explicit, imperative requirements of the Supreme Law of the Land "illegal"?

147 posted on 06/11/2012 1:07:36 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

“How is enforcing the most important, explicit, imperative requirements of the Supreme Law of the Land “illegal”? “

Sad and tawdry indeed. That you might take a couple hundred votes away from someone who has a chance to stop Obama is truly tragic.


149 posted on 06/11/2012 1:10:13 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

“How is enforcing the most important, explicit, imperative requirements of the Supreme Law of the Land “illegal”? “

BTW, there is no “most important” or “explicit” part of the Constitution.

Have you ever actually read it?


155 posted on 06/11/2012 1:17:50 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson