Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Clear enough?
1 posted on 06/11/2012 9:17:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: EternalVigilance

Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing....


570 posted on 06/21/2012 8:24:39 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is, it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
I use to actually believe that the republican party wanted to stop abortions. I no longer believe this. (especially with the crowning of romney)

I know NOTHING about law, but to stop abortion legally, it seems all they have to do is bring in geneticist or biologist or whoever that can prove the baby is a human being. The definition of a person is a human being separate from different entity. Mother and baby are not same entity as they can have different blood type, plus no babies have ever grown up to be their mothers or clone of their mother. I know “personhood” is the question. Liberals want personhood to miraculously happen after the baby is born. Some even want it when the baby becomes aware. I think they want it that way so it can work at the beginning of life and end of life; the cold-hearted @#%$.

Actually, after trying to analyze this....it all comes down to getting the liberals out of the supreme court because they will continue to move the goal post of what a person is. Unfortunately, there is little hope of changing the courts if romney wins, as 75% of his nominees were radical liberals. He also has made it quite clear he does not want the conservative vote; so real conservatives will not vote for him anyway.

Our constitution says every person has a right to life. But not when there is money to be made at the local planned parenthood.

600 posted on 06/22/2012 6:54:16 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Tom:

This is straight from the Party Platform on your website.

We seek the passage of a Federal Marriage Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and oppose all attempts everywhere to redefine marriage as being anything but what it has always been: the union of one man and one woman. Since the natural family is the basic God-given institution of our civilization, and the nursery of our future, it must be protected from all who would destroy it.

Apropos of protecting marriage from those who would destroy it, are you in favor of the current low threshold for divorce in most states? What do you think are acceptable grounds for divorce??

610 posted on 06/23/2012 7:39:45 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Ut veniant omnes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Tom as a president, can you describe a means of doing this within the confines of the Constitution.

Thank you.


632 posted on 06/30/2012 9:51:28 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; EternalVigilance

Tues. 1 pm Bump!


636 posted on 07/03/2012 12:56:12 PM PDT by Golden Gate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson