Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks
And see, this is where you throw me totally for a loop...

I said..."So in a round about way you're saying that it should never have even been mentioned that the real mother's name was known until all of the information was compiled?"

To which you replied...YES.

So if it's so important not to let the cat out of the bag that the real name is known then why did you make that statement back in September of 2011?

Is Anna Obama his real mother and, if so, why did you release that information before all of the information was compiled?

430 posted on 06/19/2012 5:51:18 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36; Brown Deer; PhilDragoo; little jeremiah
I did not say Anna Obama is the 'real mother' but what I did do is repeatedly show there were two little boys - one a little older than the other, one light skinned, one dark, one is shown with his father and Ruth in Kenya, the other is zero. Please don't ask me to go through that again. I really really am tired of repeating myself. I know what to anticapte, a dozen or so experts will show up and tell me that one of the boys is David. There never was a David, a number of people have tried hard to find any evidence that a David existed. No one could find him. Died in a motor accident did he? How very convenient.

HERE'S THE PHOTOGRAPH ONE MORE TIME:

Hasn't it struck anyone yet that if zero and that dark boy were together, it was the older boy who was the son of the kenyan, and that it was his mother who ended up 'the wife from whom he was separated, living in the Philippines' according to the INS documents?

Now watch the smart-a$$es come out of the woodwork. The usual explanation I get is the reason the boy on the left is the spitting image of zero is because his father was the same man. But one of those boys ended up in Kenya, around 1965 or 1966, because that's Ruth there holding Mark, who was born the year after she went to Kenya, in late 1964.

The result is simply that you do not know who zero's parents were or where he was born or when his birthdate is.

The first time you see zero (aside from a baby photo on his own) is in the two little boys image, and then shortly afterwards, Stanley Ann is shown holding him sitting on the fence...and that's why we laughingly call her The Nanny. If they had a photograph of SAD with zero as a baby, we would have seen it by now. She simply wasn't there until the kid was two or three years old, around the same time as the dark boy shows up in Kenya.

Btw, the original of the two little boys was posted by Mark Ndesandjo on his own website and the image, after a short period of showing a similar image that was untinted, (not mauve, but black and white) which made the two boys appear to be the same skin colour, the image of the two little boys has been removed from the website.

Now watch the nay-sayers appear like flies to compost. Their devotion to 'David' is as strong as it is to the Stanley Ann Dunham mother-myth.

It's well past time for an epiphany.

432 posted on 06/19/2012 6:40:39 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson