Posted on 06/02/2012 8:05:13 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
Sure looks to me like they’re going to be able to run out the clock.
You may very well be right, at least in terms of avoiding ouster before the elections this fall. Five months is an eternity in politics, however. Literally anything can happen between now and November.
Arpio's Cold Case Posse could give their next report on their findings, said to be "shocking," any day now.
Additionally, there is a judge in Florida who has allowed discovery to go forward on the two-parent aspect of natural born citizenship.
I thought this was interesting concerning judge Terry Lewis:
Klayman told WND that during a hearing today on discovery issues in the case, Lewis noted that while Klayman’s brief cited a U.S. Supreme Court’s decision defining “natural born citizen” as the offspring of two citizens of the nation, the White House’s arguments provided no citations.
We'll see. Or not. Either way, it's been one heck of an intellectual journey researching all of this stuff. Fascinating in a horrific, outrage-inspiring way.
I agree with your scenario. My belief is that SCOTUS knew about his eligibility problems from the get-go but wanted to avoid political disruption. Let the voters remove BO, they will do the cleanup work.
Of course, there is the little matter of two seats on the SCOTUS having to be vacated because they were filled by the usurper's appointees.
Drudge had something up yesterday about Jill Biden saying "Joe will make a great President."
Supposedly for 2016.
Really, now?
Of course, there is the little matter of two seats on the SCOTUS having to be vacated because they were filled by the usurper’s appointees.
As well as the prosecution of forging state and federal documents...I’m wondering if the citizens of the US can file a class action civil lawsuit against the fraud to ensure he does not benefit financially from “selling his story”.
Supposedly for 2016."
Yeah, I saw that. Since "Obama" failed to demonstrably qualify for office by the time of inauguration, under the Twentieth Amendment Section 3, Biden has technically been president since 20 January 2009 from my understanding.
Perhaps that's why the swearing-in ceremony was "flubbed" by Chief Justice Roberts. . .
Yes.
When I watched the video of Biden's swearing-in, I heard Justice Stevens address him as "Mr. President" (almost with an audible chuckle).
You will recall that Biden did NOT flub his oath.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.