Ron Paul - A Human Life Amendment should do two things. First, it should define life as beginning at conception and give the unborn the same protection all other human life enjoys. Second, it must deal with the enforcement of the ruling much as any law against violence doesthrough state laws.
To summarize my viewsI believe the federal government has a role to play, said Paul. I believe Roe v. Wade should be repealed. I believe federal law should declare that life begins at conception. And I believe states should regulate the enforcement of this law, as they do other laws against violence.
I dont see the value in setting up a federal police force on this issue any more than I do on other issues, Paul said. The Fourteenth Amendment was never intended to cancel out the Tenth Amendment. This means that I cant agree that the Fourteenth Amendment has a role to play here, or otherwise we would end up with a Federal Department of Abortion. Does anyone believe that will help life? We should allow our republican system of government to function as our Founders designed it to: protect rights at the federal level, enforce laws against violence at the state level.
As President, I will sign and aggressively advocate for a law that removes abortion from the jurisdiction of the federal courts, said Paul. This approach, done by simple majority vote and stroke of my Presidential Pen, would effectively overturn Roe v. Wade and allow states to pass strong pro-life legislation immediately. Millions of lives would be saved by this approach while we fight to make every state a right to life state.
How could he be more pro life????
The votes are as I stated, Paul voted that way and they are not pro-life, no matter how much other stuff you bring up, those votes are not pro-life.
“How could he be more pro life????”
According to some on this thread, he should ignore the Constitution and do what they want him to do. Damn the consequences...