Posted on 06/01/2012 12:02:30 PM PDT by ElIguana
ACN Staff) The House of Representatives failed to pass a bill that would ban sex selective abortions on Thursday. Although a majority voted in favor of the bill (246-168), the measure reqired a two-thirds majority vote to pass. Many may be under the impression that the final vote tally was along party lines; however 20 Democrats actually voted in favor of the ban and shockingly, seven Republicans votes against banning sex selective abortions. Those Republicans were...
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeamericaonline.blogspot.com ...
Read my post #69 (Ron Paul's documented words) look for the word "life" and what he says about life in the womb.... as for funding yes he wants to end funding for abortion too ...that is a good thing... Duh! If you still don't get it... I got no more time for you... there are babies to save!
States have the death penalty. Again, you fail Constitution 101...
The U.S. Constitution:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to...secure the Blessings of Liberty to...Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." "No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law." "No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution..."
Well, they wont be babies conceived from rape.
Or babies aborted by minors transported across state lines.
Or girl babies is sex selection abortions.
I’m sorry you don’t understand the obvious distinction between those convicted of a capital offense, and the explicit, imperative requirement that equal protection be provided to every innocent person in every jurisdiction.
Yeah... Sorry. Still doesn”t say what you want it to say.
Pass an Amendment or stop pretending to give a sh*t.
Pass an Amendment.
It's amazing that someone can type stuff like that while consistently ignoring the founders' assertion of the primary reason for the existence of government, which is the equal protection of the God-given, unalienable right to life of all, the stated purposes of the Constitution, all of which are grossly violated by abortion, and that document's explicit, imperative requirements as found in the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments.
If you want states to be able to alienate unalienable rights, you pass an Amendment. One which revokes the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments, all of the stated purposes of the Constitution as stated in the Preamble, repeals our national charter, the Declaration of Independence, which is the first part of the organic law of the United States, revokes the most important aspect of the natural law, as laid out by Samuel Adams and the Committees of Correspondence, and countermands God Himself and His explicit, imperative command to all mankind as found in Genesis chapter nine.
Good luck with that.
“..you pass an Amendment. One which revokes the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments, all of the stated purposes of the Constitution as stated in the Preamble, repeals our national charter, the Declaration of Independence, which is the first part of the organic law of the United States, revokes the most important aspect of the natural law, as laid out by Samuel Adams and the Committees of Correspondence, and countermands God Himself and His explicit, ..”
Darn you’re good.
Let me get this straight...
The Left uses the judiciary to legislate from the bench in Roe v Wade. Now you want the Legislature to use a Clause from the Constitution pertaining to the judiciary to find abortion illegal?
Why not just repeal Roe and pass an Amendment? Rights both wrongs and does so in accordance with how the Federal government was supposed to be run.
No wonder your political Party can’t even out-poll the Libertarians...
Wow. That whole paragraph was one big ball of collassal stupid.
All of that just to keep from having to do things the way the Founders created the system to run.
Thank you for doing this thread. By exposing Ron Paul, you are exposing LIBertarianism.
Paul does have a mixed record, but I don't see where his lifetime votes on pro-life issues would earn him only a 56 percent rating. According to NRLC (check out the "votes" tab), he has voted 75 times with them in his career, 17 times against them, and 7 votes were not scored.
Payed, murder is a Federal offence in some cases, such as when committed on Federal property, etc.
That should be, “Yes, murder is a Federal offence in some cases, such as when committed on Federal property, etc.”
(where on Earth did iPad come up with that spelling change?)
Oops, my bad. I read Ron Paul and thought Rand Paul. I also am not sure where Paul Sr. is coming from.
Of course, we don't want that. We don't want abortion either. There is a valid process for remedying this. Is it so wrong to suggest following it is the better course of action?
Congress is within its legitimate powers when it acts to defend the inalienable right not to be killed.
So, another vote for Federalizing murder. Barges. Do to really wan someone like Obama having the power to both arrest people and punish them via the death penalty? Because that is where that idea leads.
Of have we STILL. Of seen enough mission creep and slippery slope crap out of the FedGov? Will you people never learn?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.