Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
The National Review explanation was just painfully and obviously stupid. The video demo was rather poor and lacked the obvious expertise that the demos linked in post #47 has.

What was stupid about the National Review explanation? They are just presenting a fact: the PDF creation process creates layers and visual artifacts similar to the ones that birthers point to as evidence of forgery.

Why would National Review defend the validity of the certificate if they didn't believe it was real? They clearly don't like Obama and want to get rid of him.

64 posted on 05/24/2012 12:34:46 AM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: MrShoop

Yeah, right the National RINOview, mouthpiece of the GOP-e, wants to get rid of 0bama. LOL


66 posted on 05/24/2012 12:48:18 AM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY

You can divest yourself of your ignorance on Adobe Illustrator anytime you want to.

67 posted on 05/24/2012 12:50:54 AM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson