Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MrShoop
I had to go out; I was already late and couldn't wait any longer. I'm back now but limited for time so I'll make this brief.

Check my posting history. I have never called the monstrosity Obama digitally displayed a “forgery”, nor have I ever alluded to a “conspiracy”. What I have said, repeatedly, is that Obama released an “abstract”, which is what in fact he did release. This does not involve criminality on HI’s part. [Though they did obviously participate in making this particular abstract look like something it isn't. That, however, is not a criminal act—just a very deceptive one.] It only makes them an accessory to Obama’s ugly eligibility shell game.

The info on the abstract probably represents what Obama’s record currently looks like, following at least two adoptions. From that perspective, HI can cover their butt by alluding to the COLB, which also reflects the results of Obama’s adoptive machinations. Obama is the real deceiver here. He has released one thing and called it something else. In that sense, Sheriff Joe has him dead to rights, and I hope he nails Obama’s hide figuratively to the wall.

If you've spent half an hour reading over the various anomalies and other issues w the abstract, you would know there's no way it is the original LF BC. Plus, as I said, it doesn't look like the description of the ‘birth record’. As you noted, Fukino said it was half handwritten. That doesn't refer to a fully typed form that has been signed. It refers to a document that is partially typed and partially handwritten.

Here's what Abercrombie said: “It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down.”

He is referring to a notation or a listing, obviously not the standard form typed BC that was released. Unless you are deep in the tank for Obama, you can plainly see that the description of the ‘birth record’ in no way matches the mongrel form that was released. [Mongrel, because it was clearly pasted together from several other documents.]

The abstract is the reason HI gets the vapors when someone like Bennett asks for simple info. HI is walking a tightwire. They have to finagle a way to affirm the info on the COLB w’out referring to the most recently released form as an original LF BC. This explains why it took them three mos to answer Bennett's straightforward and reasonable questions.

Obama is lying like no POTUS has ever lied. You do yourself and no one else any favors by not digging in and informing yourself of the various inconsistencies and issues involved in Obama’s documents. W the MSM and the corrupt HI officials in his corner, Obama has very little to worry about. (Hopefully Sherriff Joe will nail him; Joe's really our only hope right now.) One thing we don't need is to have people shilling for Obama who haven't bothered to educate themselves on his various deceptions. The sooner Obama is called out for his lies, the better it will be for us all.

51 posted on 05/23/2012 10:26:03 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter
The short form released in the 2008 campaign was an abstract. It theoretically could have left out key details. However, the long form released last year can in no way be called an abstract. It is a copy of an original document from 1961. You can claim it is a forgery, but just based on the dates it would predate any adoption.

I know you haven't said there is a conspiracy, but the point I'm making is that for your theories to be true it necessitates a conspiracy because so many high ranking hawaiian officials are telling the same story.

54 posted on 05/23/2012 11:09:47 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson