Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: The Working Man
I have no objection to naked short selling per se. I do object when the tactic is used by investment bankers or fund managers.

If an investor (by your leave there is no sharp line between investor and speculator) wishes to expose his own portfolio to unlimited losses, that is his own business. If a banker or manager decides to expose others' portfolios to unlimited losses, that is an abrogation of fiduciary responsibility and probably should be subject to prosecution.

9 posted on 05/17/2012 7:17:53 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The_Reader_David

My problem with Naked Shorts is that the investor doesn’t OWN them. If he owned them that’s different, but he doesn’t. Naked Shorts can and definitely do lead into major stack manipulation.

In most ways this a moral thing for me. Naked shorts are just like a stranger coming into my yard and borrowing my tools and my lawn mower and using them irresponsibly and then returning them either damaged or broken.

I lost my value and usability of my tools and he got everything out of them with little or no consequences since I didn’t know he was doing it in the first place and now its too late to stop him.


13 posted on 05/17/2012 7:25:29 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson