Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage
Overstock has been after Wall St. and the Naked Shorting issue for a long time because more shares have been shorted against the company’s stock than exist in the first place. In other words certain bankster gangsters on Wall St. have launched short attacks on Overstock.com.

That is still possible even without naked short selling. Let's say that you own some stock. I borrow it from you and sell it to person B. That is normal short selling. I am so sure that it will go down that I borrow that same share from person B and sell it again. Now there are two short shares sold for only one real share existing. Each time I borrowed a real share of stock instead of a counterfeit one created by the brokerage firms like in naked short selling.

I guess it could be possible to set up regulations so that a share can only be shorted once, but that would set up a situation where a share shorted once would be a slightly less valuable stock than one that still could be shorted, which should be accounted for somehow (maybe a mandatory dividend paid by the shorter to the new owner of the stock.

26 posted on 05/17/2012 8:01:30 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

I don’t agree with you that current regulations aloow more than one share to be shorted against one share.

But it does happen the way you described but regulations do not support it. It is illegal. There has to be underlying stock to support a short sale period.


37 posted on 05/17/2012 11:14:55 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson