Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kartographer

The problem is both frequency, and dynamic range.

You may think you have a good Faraday cage using receivers but you could fall well short of performance because the signals weren’t strong enough to show your true performance under EMP conditions.

It’s better than nothing - but it’s also a false confidence builder if you get a radio to block a station.

It’s a matter of how sure you want to be. The best inexpensive ad-hoc shield I can think of is the trash can - but use steel wool fragments around the full circumference of the lip and hammer it down solid with a rubber mallet.

No guarantees, but it’s much simpler in its uncertainties than this cabinet thing.


50 posted on 05/15/2012 7:20:31 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: RFEngineer

You could also place a transmitter inside and see if you get a signal.


52 posted on 05/15/2012 7:56:39 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson