True, but this isn't a case of two candidates each with a few imperfections. Both candidates are pro-abortion, pro-sodomy=marriage, pro government controlled healthcare, pro socialist, anti-gun, Saul Alinsky linked candidates.
And frankly, when I weigh the two, I don't come up with one being a significantly lesser evil. They're equally bad!!!
If Romney wins, the muslims may not fare as well, and the nation might be a little safer security wise. However, it will be 8 years before the Republicans run someone different. And we will have a Republican president to blame for all the liberal policies. And the nation will probably vote a democrat house and congress in.
If Obama wins, the checks and balances will be tested more, but Congress and SCOTUS are already starting to buck Obama. Plus the nation will be more likely to vote in a Republican house and senate, which could block Obama and possibly impeach him.
So strange as it seems, I'm leaning towards thinking Obama is the lesser of the two evils, if only because he is more likely to be blocked and made ineffective.
And with neither candidate the obvious lesser of two evils, I'm going to use my vote to send a message to the GOP. I'm voting for the constitution party, and Virgil Goode. The constitution party isn't perfect either, but it sure beats the current GOP and Democrats.
“So strange as it seems, I’m leaning towards thinking Obama is the lesser of the two evils, if only because he is more likely to be blocked and made ineffective. “
One more on the list of Freepers supporting Obama.