Women constitute 53% of the electorate. And, in 2008, women supported Obama and the Democrats by a whopping 56-43 margin.
I meant monetary support (Soros/Trumka/most of Goldman Sachs/Union bosses etc. Had it not been for the overwhelming cash Obama things might be different regardless of how many women voted for him. Would you also take away the voting rights of people 30 and under? I believe they broke for Obama in much larger numbers than women (60%).
You want to look at the percentages for how blacks vote—and maybe argue against allowing them to vote too?
Chill, people.
Did I say anything about taking the voting rights away from anybody?
No, I did not.
Instead, I merely corrected a mistaken assertion about men being the primary supporters of Obama -- in the voting booth, anyway.
I supplied some relevant facts to the discussion, not an opinion.