I would have no problem with a woman or anyone else that owned property having the vote.
/johnny
As a woman, I agree with your post.
They screwed up when they gave anyone but landowners the vote
You are exactly right. No skin in the game, no vote.
“They screwed up when they gave anyone but landowners the vote.
I would have no problem with a woman or anyone else that owned property having the vote.”
####
This.
No Representation without Taxation.
[ They screwed up when they gave anyone but landowners the vote.
I would have no problem with a woman or anyone else that owned property having the vote.
/johnny ]
I would just be happy removing the government leeches from the roles under “confict of interest” rules.
Bingo. Jefferson knew what he was talking about...
The margin of women who vote for socialists/nanny state IS scary, so why don't we discuss it?
Heck, from what I hear about the "Life of Julia" statist propaganda piece from the Big Zero, it begs the question...what idiots are they progagandizing that would buy into that and would it be better if those (regardless of gender) who have a stake in the public trough, be restricted from voting?
I agree. People who have no vested interest in voting for anything except other people’s money for themselves have no business voting at all. It’s just wrong, prima fascia.
The 18-year-old vote is a step too far as well, especially since our schools are spitting out good little socialists who don’t become conservative until they’re older and know a rope or two.