The Constitution Party is running a candidate. So, yes there is.
We have to make do this time because we couldn’t/didn’t influence the process enough to make sure there was a conservative running.
Rewind to 2008. I tried it your way, and the candidate I supported told me it wouldn't be a bad thing if his opponent was elected President. How does that advance conservatism?
It may feel good to stand on our principles and refuse to get rid of 0 because his opponent isn’t what we want. It’s going to hurt like hell if 0 gets reelected. For a long time. And, those principles you’ve been standing on get soiled and sad.
I'll repeat the request I made upthread to a different poster. Please explain how a vote for the known progressive Mitt Romney will advance conservatism. I'm curious to have your thoughts. Thanks.
Col. - it will be later before I can get back to you with my answer. Don’t want you to think I’m ignoring you.