[BigGuy22]

Nice try, but you’re missing the obvious.

Until the courts agree with you, your argument remains a loser. Once they agree, you’ve got a winner.

Couldn’t be clearer. It has nothing to do with what I consider correct or incorrect — I’m speaking simply of success or failure in court, and my conclusions are completely self-evident.

[BigGuy22]

You folks are really too much.

I have stated an obvious fact: Every court so far has ruled against the heritage-based theory of natural born citizenship, and that indicates that there is a broad consensus in the judicial community on that subject.

If you disagree with that, show me where I'm wrong.

But instead you are pretending that I'm endorsing the consensus as "correct," and that is simply a red herring. What I've stated, what's right up above in italics, stands on its own as a matter of fact, and if you think it's factually false, tell us why.

I understand that the fact is unpalatable to you, which is why you want to run away from the facts and convert this into an argument about opinions.