“Every case has gone against you, so therefore you are WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! “ “
__
Ooops, there you go again! I never made a judgment as to right or wrong. That is a straw man of your own invention, and you just can’t seem to let go of it.
You are wrong in equating "correctness" as being proportional to the numbers of people who agree.
Your argument keeps summarizing as "This group of people say you are wrong, therefore you are wrong." Rather than saying you are wrong because (for example) "John Bingham clearly stated, and the Congress clearly inserted the words "Natural born citizen" into the 14th amendment."
They didn't, but if they had THAT would be an example of you providing evidence to support your (by the proxy of the judges) claim.
You keep trying to deflect the argument back to "nobody in power agrees with you, therefore you are wrong." You simply chose not to argue the issue on the merits (same as the judges) probably because you know that on the merits the argument of regarding "anchor babies" as citizens can easily be taken apart.