“Well, no, this is a discussion site, so I don’t have to convince judges of anything.”
__
Ah, my mistake. I thought you were trying to accomplish something within our legal system. That’s where you need to convince judges, and that’s the arena in which you’ve “accomplished absolutely zero.”
But of course if your goal is to post on a discussion site, then you’ve certainly accomplished it, and I imagine you will continue to do so!
Here’s a question: If the “legal precedent” was all that strong as cited in all these cases, why is there a need to cite all the challenges and not just the legal precedent itself?? The only citation should be directly to Wong Kim Ark and not to appeals court dicta or ballot-hearing dicta.
But of course if your goal is to post on a discussion site, then you’ve certainly accomplished it, and I imagine you will continue to do so!
We don't have to convince the judges. We have to convince the Judge's Masters, i.e. "We the People."
Convince them, and the Judges will bow and obey.