You are LOST.
I’m not going to waste my effort proving Z innocent due to medical records and will not bother producing them for you.
The subject I hit was you give yourself away, you’re not worthy of debating, by nonsensical statements that T was a 17 yr old and the other guy had the gun.
That right there, shows you up.
Then you do worse...you demand everybody prove everything to you, to demonstrate by links, etc, that Z isn’t the guilty party.
It doesn’t work that way, even though the info we have so far appears to support Z’s account...waiting for further info, and for the trial if one occurs, but so far the info is good for Z.
But the way it works is, Z is innocent of the charge of second degree murder until in a court he is proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
Meanwhile, you make a bunch of prejudicial statements that show how lost you are.
Again, it doesn’t matter if T was 17 and Z had a gun...lawful carry by permit, btw...
It only matters what happened. IF, and I said IF, T circled around behind or to the side of Z instead of going home, and if he decked him and got on top and slammed his head into concrete and if the gun possession was part of the struggle, then for Z it was kill or be killed or horribly injured.
The age of the assaulter or whether he was with or without a gun is irrelevant.
That you love to fling those words into the faces of people you disagree with on the case is very telling.
You’ve made your posts as irrelevant as these items you love to feature will be in a court of law.
All I am saying is show me the evidence that Zimmerman’s head was “smashed” into the concrete. Please calm down, let the process prove or disprove Zimmerman’s claim. I will be the first to admit I was wrong if the evidence shows, how about you?
Blind Faith: accepting Zimmerman’s word as the the only truth, indeed the “holy” word. No one should accept this, we are ony asking for more information. Please, that is all that all that I’m asking. Why does that upset so many on this thread? Zimmerman is not a hero, that does not mean he is guilty of second degree murder. It does show that there are questions that need to be addressed. Let’s address these questions. And let’s stop calling names. That serves no useful purpose.