Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sun
Yes, Newt already endorsed Romney

Hello simpleton. No, Gingrich as of the 27th April in that dated article, and as of today that I've seen, he has not formally endorsed Romney.

From the article - "...Perry said, according to Reuters...."

As we see it was "Perry said" who endorsed but not Gingrich. My question to you was has Gingrich endorsed Romney as of yet. The answer is still categorically no.

Many of you Newt supporters have so much egg on your face, that we will only laugh when we read your user name. I’m not putting all Newt supporters in the same basket, but you know who you are.

Well, for someone who can't get the simple facts straight, no one should take your word for it or anything else.

when Rick did NOT endorse Mitt yet, but Newt DID.

It will be a two-fer for Ricky endorsing Mittens. The first one was in 2008 and he will again in 2012. And again Newt has not.

55 posted on 04/29/2012 8:04:15 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
Newt endorsed Romney, in effect, when he continued on past Super Tuesday. Of course, he left his supporters with thinly veiled “deniability,” huh!?

Any thinking human being, knew a Newt win was not only impossible, but also not even the intent of his campaign.

Newt's intent was to siphon off the secularist conservative vote form the whole of the conservative vote...effectively splitting at the y the true religious conservatives from the secularist pseudo-conservatives, ensuring the globalist Romney nomination.

The secularist conservative identifies with Gingrich and believes the myth of separation of church and state.

These conservatives, much like the Tea Party conservatives, ultimately fail in achieving any real conservatism at all. Because without God...without morality, America has lost all blessings.

Of course, nobody is going tell these hyped up puffed up persons their business, so this will all go unadmitted, denied, and lied about. But, we'll all be begging for God mercy soon enough.

57 posted on 04/30/2012 5:16:42 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel

You libs, and yes liberal Republicans are libs, too, get testy when proven wrong, and often resort to name calling.

Here it is again:

“According to Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond, on Wednesday morning, the former House Speaker spoke to Romney by phone and shared that he will endorse him for the presidency, The Wall Street Journal reported.”

But I bet you still can’t figure it out.

Here more from the link:

“The former Pennsylvania senator has avoided using the word “endorsement”’

But WORSE, Newt helped Romney win the nomination, even after Romney did this to Newt:

“Romney insists on trying to destroy Newt Gingrich over the same false, trumped-up ethics charges just like Democrats did. He’s acting exactly like a power hungry Democrat who is willing to say anything to get elected ..”

excerpt http://www.therightscoop.com/new-romney-ad-smears-newt-over-old-ethics-charges/

Romney joins the Dems, with their trumped up charges, even though Newt was vindicated, but yet, Newt helped Romney. How ironic.


65 posted on 04/30/2012 8:17:15 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson