To: jmstein7
Sorry “Failure to endorse Gingrich” does not equal “Washington Insider sell out.”
2 posted on
04/19/2012 11:50:37 AM PDT by
DannyTN
To: DannyTN
Sorry “Failure to endorse Gingrich” does not equal “Washington Insider sell out.”Ordinarily, no. But when the only other option is Mitt Romney, the establishment candidate, it certainly does have a whiff of selling-out.
To: DannyTN
Correct... It is his voting record as a senator that makes him a sell out....
14 posted on
04/19/2012 12:14:02 PM PDT by
joe fonebone
(If you vote for the lesser of two evils, you are still voting for evil.)
To: DannyTN
What is the point of endorsing a man who has won but TWO states out of thirty-something? NO, it would not help Newt. It is too late. This is getting as silly as the Ron Paul meme from his supporters. We may have had had our day if Palin ran, or if enough Republicans were strong-minded enough to resist the phony Romney attack ads against Santorum. But it’s freakin’ over, Folks! Bob
16 posted on
04/19/2012 12:15:10 PM PDT by
alstewartfan
( 27 of 36 Romney judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
To: DannyTN
Has anybody in this country heard of core conviction and priciple.I don't care if Newt is down in the polls.Rick claims he's the conserative,why not stand on pricipale?
29 posted on
04/19/2012 12:38:41 PM PDT by
ivory49
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson