Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, Republicans: Fire, Aim, Ready!
WingRight.org ^ | April 12, 2012 | Beverly Nuckols, MD (hocndoc)

Posted on 04/12/2012 8:09:43 AM PDT by hocndoc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-198 next last
To: eastforker

Both.

Look fork. I know you just showed up, and imediatly got your panties in a wad over some remark not directed to you, but please...

Inform yourself first before hitting send. It will make you look so much better intead of foolish.

Look at the replies for instance. Me and many others do not agree with voting for RINO’s simply because a RINO is better than Obama.

“Unpopular to who?? You or the owner of this site?”

I’ll spare you the embarrassment of pinging Jim to this reply. Ping him yourself if you want to. Ask him if he agrees with “very unpopular ‘Repubs First’ ideas.”

But I’m guessing you won’t do that. I’m guessing you already know what he thinks.


121 posted on 04/12/2012 10:29:56 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I agree. My husband and I have been going back and forth between Santorum and Gingrich. At least now we don’t have to choose (-— and I’ve finally quit wishing for Rick Perry to be on the ballot).


122 posted on 04/12/2012 10:30:25 AM PDT by hocndoc (WingRight.org: I have a mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
Doc, common ground is hard to find if the electorate decides that if the candidate doesn't think or say exactly the things that benefit me, Than I won't vote for him. Sorta like union thugs that will walk out on strike over a minor issue jeopardizing the well being of it's members. It's all or nothing with some folks.
123 posted on 04/12/2012 10:31:35 AM PDT by eastforker (Don't be ornery for Romney, instead Root for Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc; eastforker

“...finding common ground.”???

Fiding common ground? On a contentious FR thread like this. I’d so much rather fight with eastforker.

Why mess with tradition.

(lololol)


124 posted on 04/12/2012 10:34:25 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

Thanks for the ping. For the record, I have not said that Lightworker Hussein or Bishop Willard are demons, although I do think they are wholly owned subsidiaries. Chattel assets, essentially.

I think this analogy is what you are referring to:

##########################

Conservative: “I can’t stand Baal. He is a demon, and I have higher standards than that. Further, it is my duty to resist hell itself, and to defeat it where I can. We all have that duty.”

Party Peon: “A vote against Baal is a vote for Abaddon!!!”

Stunned Conservative. “Uh . . . No. I do not vote for demons. I am not voting for either of them.”

Party Peon: “YES YOU ARE! A VOTE AGAINST BAAL IS A VOTE FOR ABADDON! VOTE FOR BAAL BECAUSE HE IS BETTER THAN ABADDON! IF YOU DO NOT VOTE FOR BAAL IT IS BECAUSE YOU SECRETLY WORSHIP ABADDON AND WANT TO SEE HIM IN CHARGE!”

Stunned Conservative: “Dude, they are BOTH DEMONS! Either of them will make this place hell on earth! I don’t want either one in charge. I -HATE- demons and will not choose either one!”

Party Peon: “YES YOU HAVE YOU TRAITOR! YOU’RE VOTING FOR ABADDON IF YOU WON’T VOTE FOR BAAL! I WOULD VOTE FOR LUCIFER HIMSELF TO DEFEAT ABADDON, AS NOTHING EVER EVER EVER EVER COULD POSSIBLY BE WORSE THAN ABADDON!”

Stunned Conservative: “Dolt. Abaddon, Baal and Lucifer are all on the same team. They are each diabolical and I will not aid, assist or support any of them. They are DEMONS.”

Party Peon: “You are a bigot.”

###############################

This was an effort to communicate how repugnant and unacceptable a capitulation candidate, not a ‘compromise’ candidate is. The effort seems to have failed. I can’t figure out how to make it more clear, and perhaps there is a refusal to understand.

I was inspired by some Romney supporter who expressed a willingness to vote for Satan himself, because ‘nothing could be worse than Obama’.

Heh. Really?

Anyway, I have this on good authority:
“Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.” Being one who does fear, you will not see kneeling at the tophet on the left, or kneeling on the tophet to the right. Both are branch offices of Hell.

This election is a test for all Americans. I am not falling for the trick question. My answer is: (C.) None of the above.


125 posted on 04/12/2012 10:35:02 AM PDT by Psalm 144 ("I'm not willing to light my hair on fire to try and get support. I am who I am." - Willard M Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Jim and I went round and around yesterday, one on one, so don’t think I am timid or cowardly! As far as popular ideas go, I have found about 2-1 in favor of romney over obama in general, even if they have to hold their nose. It is evident you are playing favor for status, not very becoming at all for you.


126 posted on 04/12/2012 10:38:08 AM PDT by eastforker (Don't be ornery for Romney, instead Root for Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

It is evident you are playing favor for status, not very becoming at all for you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

lolol. Now that’s funny. I don’t know how many rounds you’ve gone through against Jim, but I’ll match you 2 to 1 with my issues I’ve had with management throughout the years.

No way am I gonna ping Jim now. To do what? Rule who he likes the least? Me or you?

lololol


127 posted on 04/12/2012 10:45:05 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Here’s the history of Presidential votes. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781450.html

How did we get voters out in 2000 and 2004? How can we get them out in 2012?

Like most people on this board, I don’t think we can break records for Republicans if Romney is the candidate. On the other hand, the Dems can’t count on the wave for Obama, either.

Nevertheless, I’m asking for Conservatives to fight *for* Conservatives where they can, not *against* anyone but Obama and the Dems.


128 posted on 04/12/2012 10:47:46 AM PDT by hocndoc (WingRight.org: I have a mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eastforker; Responsibility2nd

If it were easy, the Dems would do it.

Dare: Try to go one day without the zingers.


129 posted on 04/12/2012 10:58:38 AM PDT by hocndoc (WingRight.org: I have a mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Oh geez, what was I thinking? Push the button for Perot.


130 posted on 04/12/2012 11:01:46 AM PDT by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts

So you believe that McCain would have given us 2 worse Supremes than Obama? And worse foreign policy? Seriously?


131 posted on 04/12/2012 11:03:44 AM PDT by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

I was hoping someone would speak up about that before I had to.

We’ve had some bad blood over Santorum, so I was expecting that if I did, it’d have turned into a bloodbath.


132 posted on 04/12/2012 11:05:22 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
Another from Mama: You can’t change what the other guy does, only what you do.

And Mama is absolutely correct! When it was clear that, no matter what I said or did, nothing was going to change, I altered my course accordingly.

133 posted on 04/12/2012 11:05:22 AM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

“You obviously have conservatives confused with Republicans. Lately that is not the same thing.”

I’m a Federalist, not a conservative. I vote Republican because one of only two candidates in the general election is going to win. I don’t give a rip what you call yourself, if you vote other than the Repub, you are re-electing Obama.


134 posted on 04/12/2012 11:06:31 AM PDT by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

An old democrat saying: “You vote for the party, not for the man” That is exactly how Obama got elected in 2008, clinton in ‘92 and carter in ‘76. We the pubs didn’t vote the party in them years, we didn’t vote for the party, we decided not to vote for our man.


135 posted on 04/12/2012 11:08:31 AM PDT by eastforker (Don't be ornery for Romney, instead Root for Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Time for the Tea Party to become the next Conservative Party.

My hope is for a mass migration of Tea Partiers to the Constitution Party and dump the Whigs.

136 posted on 04/12/2012 11:11:15 AM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Leonard210; CharacterCounts

Would McCain’s Attorney General go out of his way to undermine the Defense of Marriage Act? Refuse to defend it in Court? Would he tell the Military to give out same-sex marriage benefits regardless of the law?

How would a McCain AG have looked at the Black Panther case, or any of a dozen State laws on immigration?

Would McCain have issued Executive Orders that overturned all of Bush’s pro-life, pro-marriage and pro-conscience regulations on January 21, 2009?

Does anyone seriously believe that even Romney would have done any of these?


137 posted on 04/12/2012 11:11:54 AM PDT by hocndoc (WingRight.org: I have a mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Who would we be voting for in the Constitution Party?


138 posted on 04/12/2012 11:13:35 AM PDT by hocndoc (WingRight.org: I have a mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
I’m calling for a Conservative coalition, from this point forward.

I am too... in a different party. The rust is too deep in the GOP... its long past time to start fresh.

139 posted on 04/12/2012 11:13:46 AM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

The nominee with the highest level profile is Virgil Goode. “Virgil Goode 2012” and there’s a wealth of background and voting data.


140 posted on 04/12/2012 11:15:33 AM PDT by ScottinVA (A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson