Replies

[[I think it’s more likely to be the second than the first but don’t have enough info to be sure.]]

By law, it should be the second- it doesn’t mastter IF martin saw zimmerman as ‘an aggressor’ Martin STILL HAD NO RIGHT TO CRIMINALLY ASSAULT Zimmerman- what the hell do peopel NOT understand about This?

[[it only matters if the kid *had good reason* to see Zimmerman as a threat]]

Beign followed is NOT ‘good reason’ to see soemoen as a risk and is NEVER justification for criminally assaulting that person- period! Trayvon commited a criminal act on Geoge- George did NOT commit ANY crimes i nthis case

Again- Martin did NOT hasve4 the right to assault and attempt to murder George Zimmerman, and Zimmerman had EVERY RIGHT to defend hismelf with deadly force when it became evident martin was terying to kill him- ANY TIME someone takes your head and bashes it agaisnt a solid object, you can reasonably assume that person intends to murder you and you have EVERY RUIGHT to protect yourself with deadly force

Martin thoguth he was a tough guy, decided agaisnt his girlfrioend’s wishes to confront george zimmerman, and made a VERY SERIOUS mkistake and paid for it with hisw life-

Again to those hwo think martin might have ‘seen zimmerman as threat’ Being followed is NEVER a reason to criminally assault someone especially with intent to murder- there is nothign more to discuss abotu that fact- Martin attacked zimerman with depraved indifference to zimmetrmans’s safety and well being- Martin apaprently made it very clear his intent to murder zimmerman- Zimmerman NEVER issued any such kind of threat toward Trayvon- Never!

IF someoen has evidence showing trayvon infact perceived zimmerman as a threat- and can show why he had reason to, present it- but hte facts of the case and witnesses and actiosn of trayvon show that htis is not the case

I don't know if you misunderstood my post or if you agree or disagree with it Zimmerman,I suppose,could have acted unreasonably and,as a result,the kid could reasonably have feared for his safety.That is,Zimmerman may have had a "Rambo" kind of mentality which would cause a reasonable person to be fearful.Or the reverse could be true,Zimmerman acting reasonably and a punk kid acting like a punk kid.

I'm not 100% certain of who is,in *fact*,responsible but at this point my hunch is that Zimmerman was justified.