National Elections with Chicago Style vote rigging! A NEW LOW for AMERICAN POLITICS! SOE (a US vote processing company) has been purchased by a Spanish company SYCTL (a George Soros influenced company). So Our Votes for 2012 Election will be counted overseas by a George Soros Company. No wonder Obama is confident he will win. No I mean 'he will win'.
Michael Savage: How Obama fixed 2012 election
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dmJtaOO2etc#!
http://www.westernjournalism.com/spanish-company-will-count-american-votes-ov...
http://www.dailypaul.com/225552/obama-sold-vote-count-to-company-in-spain-lin...
WATCH THIS VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VaGCmO59lUU#!
http://gulagbound.com/28231/major-obama-crony-contributor-company-to-count-an...
In January 2012 a [then] quiet deal was struck between SOE Software (then the leading US vote tabulation company. Scytl is said to be strongly linked to George Soros. The Obama syndicate members arranged the deal and Obama's now wholly-owned rubber-stamp Congress agreed to it. That's right. A foreign company may now, ostensibly and unconstitutionally, determine who wins US "elections." Of extreme interest, Scytl's CEO, Pere Valles, was the former VP and CFO of GlobalNet whose headquarters were based in Obama's then base of operations Chicago. Although apparently scrubbed from Obama's donor list (as so many negative and potentially negative-to-Obama documents and videos have been), Valles is said to have contributed heavily to Obama's first presidential run.
Although US States and their precincts are the ones who Constitutionally have counted votes since the US began as a nation, the indication seems to be that all States may now be told by the Obama government that all votes--nationwide--will be tabulated by the foreign company. Also, as all votes are "merged" under the Scytl system, no recounts will be available. Note: As an added "feature," Scytl also has a specific program for military votes. I guess we can now assume military votes will be summarily dismissed if a Marxist-Democrat is in power.
Digging deeper into the 2012 vote count controversy
http://www.examiner.com/article/digging-deeper-into-the-2012-vote-count-controversy
Thus, what, exactly, is the problem with the various jurisdictions using SCYTL?
Critics say that the machines and software the company provides are too vulnerable to hackers and to those intent on perpetrating voter fraud. In 2010, Washington, D.C.’s new electronic voting system installed by SCYTL was hacked. And during the South Carolina Republican Primary this year there were numerous reports of irregularities associated with the company’s electronic system.
The problems associated with electronic voting led to a major complaint being filed with the Election Assistance Commission by Voter Action.
Prior to 2012 much of the software being used for voting system upgrades came from a company called SOE. However, SCYTL acquired SOE in a purchase agreement in late 2011 and early 2012. The platform that SCYTL currently uses actually originated with SOE before the acquisition.
But herein lies yet another problem inherent with the software, according to critics. Elections and vote fraud expert Bev Harris of Black Box Voting says that the uniform system SCYTL now uses makes it nearly impossible to check for accuracy, given that it does not mandate a paper trail of votes. There is no proof, no written record, no documentation.
If the company utilized two separate counting systems, the two could be compared and contrasted to test for accuracy. But such a system of checks and balances is not being implemented by the company, and some states no longer require a paper record of votes.
Perhaps the most dangerous aspect of systems like that of SCYTL, however, is the fact that it is possible for elections officials in government, and the computer programmers who work with the machines and software, to see how each individual citizen votes. According to Harris, such a system is a direct threat to voter privacy.
Harris states that public officials in Colorado have admitted that they can see how an individual citizen votes.
snip
Thus, while the software provided by SCYTL is vulnerable, the broader issue lies with local elections officials who sometimes operate outside the boundaries of the law. This is not the fault of the company but is an indication of a systemic cancer that is growing within the U.S. regarding the integrity of those who are chosen to manage the elections process.
Incompetence is also an issue according to those who monitor the elections process.