Well, surely this will not stand.
This makes the 2012 election a joke.
The 2012 election has more voters than people and all of them are democrat.Note 1960 election.
Michael Savage discusses this in his just released book, “Trickel Down Tyranny”.
If the GOP is not seriously looking into this, something is wrong.
Here is a formula for an electronic/online election system that is not corruptible.
When you vote, you will receive a paper or electronic output with a GUID (globally unique identifier, a well understood computer science artifact) as well as your vote record on all issues.
Online, there is a database containing the entire vote record, accessible by anyone through the Internet. Any record can be retrieved using the corresponding GUID. That way any individual voter can check to see that their vote is properly reflected in the vote database. Also, anyone can download the entire database and audit the results. There would still be no way to link any particular individual to a particular vote record, other than the artifact you receive after voting.
I do see one problem with this, and that is ensuring that the mass download data reflects the individually cast votes - that would require software/database audits from multiple trusted entities. Perhaps cryptographic checksums could help with the overall voting record.
At any rate, it would be head and shoulders above the current system.
ping
The Romney selection was rigged. I’m 99% convinced the general election is going to be rigged.
It is outrageous that a company in a foreign country controls or even has first hand knowledge of how people in the USA have voted. Where are our protectors/congresspeople on this happening? Could it be that some pockets were filled with international interest’s money? Naw, never could happen with our politicians all spouting their kind of love for the USA.
The Obummer regime now outsourcing voter fraud?
The only thing more appropriate would be if a company in Kenya had bought the American corporation out.
Surely there is something unconstitutional about this.
mark.
