Skip to comments.
Spanish company will count American votes overseas in November
Coach is Right ^
| 4/10/2012
| Doug Book
Posted on 04/10/2012 9:07:06 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Oldpuppymax
Well, surely this will not stand.
2
posted on
04/10/2012 9:13:56 AM PDT
by
ngat
To: Oldpuppymax
This makes the 2012 election a joke.
3
posted on
04/10/2012 9:14:22 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Oldpuppymax
The 2012 election has more voters than people and all of them are democrat.Note 1960 election.
4
posted on
04/10/2012 9:27:58 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: philman_36
Tsis aggression will not stand...This will not stand!
5
posted on
04/10/2012 9:29:26 AM PDT
by
ngat
To: Oldpuppymax
Michael Savage discusses this in his just released book, “Trickel Down Tyranny”.
If the GOP is not seriously looking into this, something is wrong.
6
posted on
04/10/2012 9:30:14 AM PDT
by
Signalman
To: Signalman
Somthing became wrong the day the ‘fix’ was in and we are stuck with a choice between Romney and Obama.
7
posted on
04/10/2012 9:34:04 AM PDT
by
JSDude1
To: JSDude1
2012 A Spanish company.
2016 A Saudi company...
Mark my words.
8
posted on
04/10/2012 9:43:02 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1176 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: Oldpuppymax
Here is a formula for an electronic/online election system that is not corruptible.
When you vote, you will receive a paper or electronic output with a GUID (globally unique identifier, a well understood computer science artifact) as well as your vote record on all issues.
Online, there is a database containing the entire vote record, accessible by anyone through the Internet. Any record can be retrieved using the corresponding GUID. That way any individual voter can check to see that their vote is properly reflected in the vote database. Also, anyone can download the entire database and audit the results. There would still be no way to link any particular individual to a particular vote record, other than the artifact you receive after voting.
I do see one problem with this, and that is ensuring that the mass download data reflects the individually cast votes - that would require software/database audits from multiple trusted entities. Perhaps cryptographic checksums could help with the overall voting record.
At any rate, it would be head and shoulders above the current system.
To: All
It has also been claimed that SKYTL CEO Pere Valles is a socialist who donated heavily to the 2008 Obama campaign and lived in Chicago during Obamas time as Illinois State Senator. Unfortunately, given what is known about the character of Barack Obama, such rumors must be taken as serious threats to the integrity of the 2012 vote and the legitimate outcome of the election.
To: Signalman
All the sudden “PAGE NOT FOUND.”
To: imemyself
it’s back - must have been a glitch. sorry.
To: imemyself
it’s back - must have been a glitch. sorry.
To: Signalman; mnehring; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; ...
It's going to be a busy week.
It has also been claimed that SKYTL CEO Pere Valles is a socialist who donated heavily to the 2008 Obama campaign and lived in Chicago during Obamas time as Illinois State Senator. Unfortunately, given what is known about the character of Barack Obama, such rumors must be taken as serious threats to the integrity of the 2012 vote and the legitimate outcome of the election.
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you need to threaten to report me to the Admin if I dont add you to the list...
14
posted on
04/10/2012 10:13:21 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1176 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: null and void
It just gets worse and worse
I wonder if O will take over Venezuela when Hugo dies as well???
15
posted on
04/10/2012 10:19:40 AM PDT
by
Nifster
To: NEW YORKCITYGOPMAN
To: PreciousLiberty
When you vote, you will receive a paper or electronic output with a GUID (globally unique identifier, a well understood computer science artifact) as well as your vote record on all issues. Online, there is a database containing the entire vote record, accessible by anyone through the Internet. Any record can be retrieved using the corresponding GUID. That way any individual voter can check to see that their vote is properly reflected in the vote database. It would be a marvelous method to enable buying votes. Hand over your receipt with your GUID to your precinct captain or union shop steward, and if your vote checks out "right" you get small bottle of booze or whatever. If you don't hand it over then they lean on you.
17
posted on
04/10/2012 11:06:23 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
To: Oldpuppymax
The Romney selection was rigged. I’m 99% convinced the general election is going to be rigged.
18
posted on
04/10/2012 11:18:31 AM PDT
by
Terry Mross
("It happened. And we let it happen." - Peter Griffin, Family Guy)
To: PreciousLiberty
Here is a formula for an electronic/online election system that is not corruptible.
When you vote, you will receive a paper or electronic output with a GUID (globally unique identifier, a well understood computer science artifact) as well as your vote record on all issues.
Online, there is a database containing the entire vote record, accessible by anyone through the Internet. Any record can be retrieved using the corresponding GUID. That way any individual voter can check to see that their vote is properly reflected in the vote database. Also, anyone can download the entire database and audit the results. There would still be no way to link any particular individual to a particular vote record, other than the artifact you receive after voting.
I do see one problem with this, and that is ensuring that the mass download data reflects the individually cast votes - that would require software/database audits from multiple trusted entities. Perhaps cryptographic checksums could help with the overall voting record.
At any rate, it would be head and shoulders above the current system.
Take it one step further - make sure the raw data/database can be collected (preferably live, or as live as live can get) by any person/business who wants it. That way anybody can call bullpucky on bad actors trying to muck around with the results.
To: Oldpuppymax
It is outrageous that a company in a foreign country controls or even has first hand knowledge of how people in the USA have voted. Where are our protectors/congresspeople on this happening? Could it be that some pockets were filled with international interest’s money? Naw, never could happen with our politicians all spouting their kind of love for the USA.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson