Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper

Something that never seems to come up in these discussions of fighting to defend your family and property.

Let us assume you gun down a group of attackers successfully. When you go to scope things, some percentage of them will be wounded, not dead.

Do you kill them in cold blood, leave them to die slowly where they lie, or take them in to patch them up, using up your space, food and medical supplies, the keeping of which was pretty much the point behind shooting them in the first place?

I’m really curious how this would be dealt with. In most of the movies the attackers are all conveniently dead.


16 posted on 04/05/2012 5:20:15 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
a) Children and wimmen stay inside until the area is clear, unless one of the wimmenfolks has a bad grudge against the goblins.

b)When you return with the all clear, they were all conveniently dead. No further discussion allowed.

c)Prayer and absolution as required by your faith.

It's not a game, it's not philosophy if it gets to that point. It's survival.

/johnny

17 posted on 04/05/2012 5:32:16 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

I’s say it depends if one of them is able to use a shovel...


18 posted on 04/05/2012 5:34:49 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
When you go to scope things, some percentage of them will be wounded, not dead. Do you kill them in cold blood

Shooting a looter is not "in cold blood."

19 posted on 04/05/2012 5:35:28 PM PDT by matt1234 (Bring back the HUAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
that why they're called ZOMBIES, don't ya watch the movies ya have to shoot'm in the head to kill'm ;)
21 posted on 04/05/2012 5:39:04 PM PDT by piroque ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
"Do you kill them in cold blood, leave them to die slowly where they lie, or take them in to patch them up, using up your space, food and medical supplies, the keeping of which was pretty much the point behind shooting them in the first place?"

Hopefully one or two of them are still able to use a shovel. Once they get finished with disposing of their dead then we gonna have us Q&A session. Then those of us who were defending will have a fair trial. And those who were attacking will be found guilty and either exiled or hung/shot. (That is if we are truly in a SHTF all government gone type situation.)

25 posted on 04/05/2012 5:42:54 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
Let us assume you gun down a group of attackers successfully. When you go to scope things, some percentage of them will be wounded, not dead.

That's when a good knife comes in handy...it saves on ammo. Once they've been questioned they are dispatched. No compassion...No remorse.

26 posted on 04/05/2012 5:43:44 PM PDT by voicereason (Dems, Pubbies...too often a one-sided coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

Should one decide to choose option number one, ammo can be cheaper and quieter at that stage of the conflict.

Sig and others offer 22LR slide conversions for some of their .3x - .4x caliber semi auto handguns, enabling a quick change of caliber.


28 posted on 04/05/2012 5:45:23 PM PDT by EasySt (Life is precious. Live it well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
Do you kill them in cold blood, leave them to die slowly where they lie, or take them in to patch them up, using up your space, food and medical supplies, the keeping of which was pretty much the point behind shooting them in the first place?

I’m really curious how this would be dealt with. In most of the movies the attackers are all conveniently dead.

Leaving your defensive position would be a tactically poor decision to put down the remaining live ones do not waste valuable bullets on the soon to be dead. Forget rendering aid they came to kill you and your family let them bleed out where they lie. If they are attracting to much attention because of noise send a single executioner out under cover of snipers to bayonet them into silence. If any are still alive enough to get up and retreat use your high powered scoped rifle and make sure they never leave the battlefield lest they go back and recruit more "zombies" (the PC term I have grown fond of)to come back for retribution; make no mistake not a single enemy can leave the battlefield alive. When the shit goes down there will be only two types of people remaining those who have/will kill to survive, be that cold blooded or not and those who will be killed by the first group.

38 posted on 04/05/2012 6:01:06 PM PDT by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

Not sure. If they ain’t to loud while they are lying there dying I’d probably let em be.

It theys noisy, it’d probably get on nerves real quick and by unsettling to my luv’d ones. Then I might pray for them, put them out of everyone’s misery and pray for them again.

Of course, unlike the movies, I’d round up anything they mightuh left behind.

Knives, guns ammo, whiskey(any alcohol) ropes, whatever.


39 posted on 04/05/2012 6:04:49 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

If he was worth shootin once he’s worth shootin twice?


58 posted on 04/05/2012 7:02:24 PM PDT by 2111USMC (Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

Survival requires hard decisions. And the right decision will not necessarily be easy to live with. You can live with a hard decision, or you can die.

It’s not just about protecting your space & supplies. It’s you life. Your family member’s lives. The term “Kill or Be Killed” is meant to be taken literally.

These attackers are going kill me, rape and worse for my wife, probably for the kids also. Do you think I am going to then rescue them with the supplies that are needed to keep my wife and kids alive? If you want to live, you will know what to do.

Our veneer of “civilization” is very thin. It will disappear very quickly.


61 posted on 04/05/2012 7:12:27 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

Any attackers that you don’t kill will know your capabilities the next time they come, which they surely will, and possibly with a lot more friends. That would be the friends that they have told about you and what you must have that is so worth defending.


78 posted on 04/05/2012 7:49:11 PM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

“Do you kill them in cold blood, leave them to die slowly where they lie, or take them in to patch them up, using up your space, food and medical supplies, the keeping of which was pretty much the point behind shooting them in the first place?”

Joshua was told to ‘kill ‘em all’. Had he been obedient, there would not be the middle east problem that we have today. That is not ‘in cold blood’. Follow the instructions to Joshua, and have a backhoe at the ready.


97 posted on 04/05/2012 10:14:26 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson