To follow your theory, the "legal forgery" would have happened back when Obama was adopted in the 1960s. Copy/paste and Photoshop layers would not have been the tools that were used to create the new documents.
I do not believe that Hawaii would use modern desktop computer tools each time a document is requested by an adopted Hawaii citizen. They would create the new document at the time of the transaction, and the new document would be reentered into the system of record to produce any future documents in a standardized way.
The fact that Obama's documents are hand-crafted suggests that they were not produced by a certified agent of Hawaii.
If the documents were not produced by Hawaii, and then if Hawaii knows that they did not issue it and remain silent about it, then they are also complicit in the fraud. Hawaii cannot call the document genuine after the fact; they cannot give ex post facto certification in order to remain silent about the fraud.
-PJ
This only serves to show you are not grasping what I am telling you. My theory doesn't require the current document to have been produced in the 1960s. My theory works just fine with this document having been produced as early as last year, or even in the last decade.
I do not believe that Hawaii would use modern desktop computer tools each time a document is requested by an adopted Hawaii citizen. They would create the new document at the time of the transaction, and the new document would be reentered into the system of record to produce any future documents in a standardized way.
This part you have correct. Where you are getting off track is thinking this document must have been forged a long time ago. I am confident that it was recently created. I believe Obama's attorney had Obama's previous adoption annulled, and they created this recent document based on information contained in his file. (Not necessarily an actual original long form birth certificate either, an "Home birth certificate" would work just fine for creating this new document. )
The fact that Obama's documents are hand-crafted suggests that they were not produced by a certified agent of Hawaii.
How does it suggest that? How do you think they CREATE new birth certificates for Adopted Children? Of COURSE they hand create it! That is EXACTLY how it is done. Way back when, it was done with photographic arts, nowadays it is done with photoshop or some other editing program.
If the documents were not produced by Hawaii, and then if Hawaii knows that they did not issue it and remain silent about it, then they are also complicit in the fraud. Hawaii cannot call the document genuine after the fact; they cannot give ex post facto certification in order to remain silent about the fraud.
And it astonishes me how people can dance all around the salient point without stepping in it. Hawaii can call the document genuine BEFORE the fact, because THEY created it. They aren't calling it a fraud because it's THEIR FRAUD!
Again, It's Sherlock Holmes all over again.
“Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?”
“To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”
“The dog did nothing in the night-time.”
“That was the curious incident,” remarked Sherlock Holmes.
- “Silver Blaze”