Skip to comments.
Justice Elana Kagan violates the law!
Self ^
| 3/29/2012
| Self
Posted on 03/29/2012 7:11:42 PM PDT by Bigun
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Bigun
Just tossing this out there... What if she waits until the conference vote on Friday, and as the most junior (?) Justice she votes last, she says, “Because of my involvement in the administration’s construction of the law, I am recusing myself.”
I almost think she may do this, especially if she sees that the vote is going clearly either for or against Obamacare, and that her vote isn’t needed. If all the other justices’ votes show a clear decision for or against the bill, she can recuse herself, saving her loss of legitimacy for another day and showing that she isn’t what we all think she is.
If, however, the vote is tied, I fully expect she will vote to save the bill, and ethics be damned; thus, our opinion about her will be proven.
21
posted on
03/29/2012 7:44:00 PM PDT
by
onemiddleamerican
(FUBO and all your terrorist buddies)
To: henbane
that made me snort so hard I believe I’ll have a nosebleed. Congressional Geldings...... new name for Republicans; how apt.
22
posted on
03/29/2012 7:48:23 PM PDT
by
Segovia
To: onemiddleamerican
What if she waits until the conference vote on Friday, and as the most junior (?) Justice she votes last, she says, Because of my involvement in the administrations construction of the law, I am recusing myself.To late!
She has already actively participated in oral arguments and needs to have articles of impeachment drawn up against her RIGHT FREEKING NOW!
23
posted on
03/29/2012 7:56:59 PM PDT
by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: Bigun
What legal recourse is there against a SC justice? Anyone know?
24
posted on
03/29/2012 8:00:12 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Bigun
Because politicians - Democrat and Republicans - care more about their jobs than about our country.
25
posted on
03/29/2012 8:02:11 PM PDT
by
ladyjane
To: bigbob
What legal recourse is there against a SC justice? Anyone know?Yes! Impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors!
26
posted on
03/29/2012 8:02:58 PM PDT
by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: bigbob
Congressman Alcee Hastings form South Florida was once a federal judge but was impeached for taking bribes. I can and should be done in this case as well!
27
posted on
03/29/2012 8:05:21 PM PDT
by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: ladyjane
Because politicians - Democrat and Republicans - care more about their jobs than about our country.Then we very definitely need some new politicians!
28
posted on
03/29/2012 8:09:02 PM PDT
by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: Bigun
Agree - wonder if anyone has the cojones to actually start the process....
29
posted on
03/29/2012 8:19:26 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Bigun
30
posted on
03/29/2012 8:23:26 PM PDT
by
thouworm
(.)
To: bigbob
Agree - wonder if anyone has the cojones to actually start the process....I doubt it unless WE stand up on our hind legs like MEN and DEMAND that it happen!
31
posted on
03/29/2012 8:30:08 PM PDT
by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: thouworm
32
posted on
03/29/2012 8:31:23 PM PDT
by
Bigun
("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
To: smalltownslick
“who can force her to do whats right?”
Congress.
To: bigbob
“What legal recourse is there against a SC justice? Anyone know?”
It’s called “impeachment.”
To: smalltownslick
If Republicans get a significant majority in Congress she should be impeached. But were that to occur, would the leadership have the stones to do it? Heck no.
35
posted on
03/29/2012 8:40:25 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: thouworm
MISTRIAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
36
posted on
03/29/2012 8:40:25 PM PDT
by
Graewoulf
((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
To: freebilly
Where is John Roberts on this? He should read the law to the stupid liberal.
To: Bigun
To: Clint N. Suhks
Sad to say, this comes down to another race issue.
Appointed by the first black President. Who is going to vote impeachment? Nobody.
39
posted on
03/29/2012 9:04:08 PM PDT
by
AGreatPer
(Obama has NEVER given a speech where he did not lie!!!)
To: smalltownslick
Roberts could force her to recuse.
40
posted on
03/29/2012 9:19:22 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson