Others have pointed out that you are accepting the word of a liberal pro-abortion doctor who shacked up with a girl 40 years his younger (who he had actually DELIVERED).
But interestingly, he claims she said this to him when he was running for congress. But the quote everybody is hanging onto says Santorum was pro-choice “until he ran for congress”. And the article shows specific statements during his run for Congress showing he was pro-life then.
So according to this pro-abortion, cradle-robbing letch of a doctor, the girl he shacked up with lied to him about Santorum being pro-choice while running for Congress. In 1990. 22 years ago.
[the girl he shacked up with lied to him about Santorum being pro-choice while running for Congress.]
Has anybody bothered recently to ask “the girl”?
If nothing else, this whole affair provides motivation for young couples-to-be to consider the question of unequal yoking: Neonatal nurse shacks up with abortionist doctor (who delivered her no less) and then marries anti-abortionist lawyer politician.
What kind of moral framework is ANY of that behavior operating in?
Were there any mistakes made? What was learned from those errors?
What does the character made self-evident through that learning process, or the lack thereof, imply about the character expected to be exercised as POTUS?
These are, or at least SHOULD BE, reasonable questions on the mind of the citizenry.
But then, who’s winning American Idol and Dancing with the Starz between commercials for Viagra and Sleeping pills — THAT’s what’s important to the McSheeple these days, isn’t it./s