Show me in the article where the source of that quote is given. That’s the point. It isn’t.
So why did you change? I asked.
I sat down and read the literature. Scientific literature.
So religion had nothing to do with it?
Oh, well, of course, he said. And religion too. It was both of those, science and religion.
The author further states "when I visited him" - it is an interview - what part of that don't you get?