Replies

Good morning, Durus. Perhaps after you have had a cup of coffee you will actually read what has been posted to you! The gist of the new info. is that all three of the top candidates have been asked the porn question, and all three have said that they would enforce the laws already on the books. The article was written to get folks like you to jump, and boy, did you ever. Why are you so easily led by the media, when for years we’ve been getting a really good education about how they operate? Is it perhaps because you have a pre-conceived bias against Santorum, who is arguably the most conservative, and mostly flagrantly Christian, of the three mentioned? Do you suppose the liberal media know how to take advantage of that to stir up trouble in their enemy’s camp? Do you want to be a pawn in their game?

Good morning to you too. I have read what had been posted to me, thank you very much, and it doesn't change the facts. Most laws concerning internet distribution of porn has been overturned. Those laws that remain should be enforced but Santorum goes further than that, and his written position sounds like a pogrom to ban porn from the internet. That is a far cry from stating passingly "I will enforce the laws on the books".

I've never been lead by the media. I don't watch TV (except for entertainment), I don't simply believe anything I read (including writers and posters that think they know everything) and I am most suspicious about anything that too easily supports my opinions. So I explore any I begin to treat as axioms often.

That being said I do have a bias against Santorum. It is based purely on his actions while in office and not a thing based on what he says. Based on his actions he is not the most conservative and no reasonable argument could be made that he is. He is a Catholic the same as Gingrich so religion shouldn't be an issue.

There are a lot of pawns in this election cycle. I don't believe I'm one of them.