I know for a fact that the INS deported BHO Sr. due to probable bigamy and that the INS FOIA evidence is in the GA court file headed to SCOTUS.
Obama attorney Jablonski cited Marguet-Pillado to the GA Superior Court as making Barry NBC so that is ALSO on the way to SCOTUS. IMO, the ONLY on-point parallel that Jablonski can claim between Barry and Marguet-Pillado is birth on foreign soil to a SINGLE mom and a biological relationship to a US citizen with the US citizen meeting the residence requirement. SADO only meets the residence requirement if she is single.
If Jablonski were to cite Marguet-Pillado and a claim that the BHO Sr.-SADO marriage was legitimate, SADO would NOT meet the residence requirement and Jablonski would be guilty of legal malpractice in exposing Barry to not even being a citizen, if born in Kenya!
It was my understanding that the INS deported him because his visa was expires. Harvard decided they were not going to sponsor an extension.
Michelle said she was "very young and very single" so where did that come from? Just more lies or a slip up?
http://blog.showmeprogress.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1297
As has already been stated, "probably bigamy" wasn't the reason Sr's Visa was not renewed.
As far as we know, and probably the state of HI in 1961 was concerned, Sr. had no documentation (like a state license or marriage cert) proving he was married in Kenya already. Such a marriage, anyway, would likely have been viewed in terms of a Common Law marriage (one without state documentation). Hawaii does not recognize common law marriages. As far as they were concerned, prior to the divorce in 1964...they *were* considered legally married in HI.
Regarding Marguet-Pillado goes, as Danae has pointed out, it's not a SCOTUS decision like Minor is.