Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1
...how many 2,000 calorie days of food they have, since that's about what an average person needs.

There are a lot of people (including myself, unfortunately) who would be able to get along well on much less than 2,000 calories per day for an extended period of time, if need be.

48 posted on 03/13/2012 10:41:27 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: DuncanWaring
There are a lot of people (including myself, unfortunately) who would be able to get along well on much less than 2,000 calories per day for an extended period of time, if need be.

True. The 2,000 calorie day is still a useful unit for counting how much food you have. I could go on short rations if necessary, but I don't think I would take my family down that road in the first 30 days of an TEOTWAWKI event. I'd rather be at full strength and maximum energy until things stabilize. After that, losing 5-10 pounds of body weight and conserving rations for the first year sounds like a good plan. If you eat less and prefer 1,500 or 1,200 calories per day for figuring, that makes sense too.

50 posted on 03/13/2012 10:57:48 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson