[Seizethecarp]

Catching up with the thread and the links at the site at the top of the thread it appears that the image being discussed is the same one from several years ago and not the newer higher resolution scan that was partially disclosed by LDS several months back...perhaps because that was all that the seller was willing to show him.

Looking at the immigration case up-thread where an ID was made of an adult using a baby footprint, I think it is possible that an ID could be made of Obama’s foot using the newer higher resolution scan of the CPGH BC (not likely a print could be obtained without warrant).

[Seizethecarp]

Here is the higher resolution footprint and two partial signature loops that match the lower resolution CPGH BC posted on this thread. It looks good enough for an ID to an adult foot, such as Barry's in my non-professional assessment. LDS claims that only this much was shown to him as part of a negotiation. LDS doesn't seem to say, yet, what happened with the negotiation.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/71212093/1961-footprint-of-Barack-Hussein-Obama-II

The inclusion of the two loops in the frame of the image matching the LDS BC in his CA court affidavit suggests that a higher resolution scan of the entire CPGH BC exists (in someone else’s possession, if you believe LDS) and this is NOT just an isolated image of a footprint which was the source for the lower resolution image and somehow pasted into and the source of the LDS image as part of a forgery.

No authentication of any of either CPGH BC image (full or partial) is yet possible. But

[Eye of Unk]

I can just imagine some people are writing up a subpoena for Obamas footprints in ink.

I bet that the Brits MI6 is under pressure keeping the witness to Obamas birth in a safe hiding spot as well.

Yes thats right, and the first Wookie knows all about it.

Answers the question why the Obamas treat the Royals with so much poo doo.