Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: harpu
The statute [Section 836.04 of the Florida Statute] stipulates that anyone who “speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity” is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree. If Rush was found guilty, the maximum penalty would be one year in jail and a $1000 fine.

Really? That's the law? Then I stand with Allred and call for a full prosecution. For all the reasons argued in this thread above. Bring it on.

23 posted on 03/10/2012 3:31:02 PM PST by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty
The statute [Section 836.04 of the Florida Statute] stipulates that anyone who “speaks of and concerning any woman, married or unmarried, falsely and maliciously imputing to her a want of chastity” is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree. If Rush was found guilty, the maximum penalty would be one year in jail and a $1000 fine.

Let me get this straight....$1,000 Fine, but yet she has to pay out $3,000 per year for her own claim of contraception expenses...and yet here we are bringing up the subject of her "chastity"??????

33 posted on 03/10/2012 3:50:15 PM PST by FDNYRHEROES (It's 3 AM. Let me sleep on it. I'll get back to you in 16 hours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson