i'm on your side.
we differ in one major respect. i think the justia scrubbing is more an indication that obama supporters thought the issue of 'natural born citizen' was a more important issue than they claimed, and that they were willing to revise U.S. Supreme Court opinions and a research process to keep some people away from relevant cases. However, I do not believe it had a significant impact on the outcome. First of all, most judges aren't even entertaining these suits. Second, most attorneys are not using justica and don't use justica. they just don't except when they need to hyperlink something for an article. if john and jane doe couldn't research it, that's a terrible thing, but i've seen no indication that lots of john and jane does were researching this, and reading minor, and looking for citing cases to read them and differentiate them.
but that doesn't mean i don't see the abject dishonor in this. if you're entrusted with U.S. Supreme Court opinions, and represent yourself as printing the full text but tweak sites and text for political purposes - that is vile and despicable. nobody should ever trust justicia again. i can't wait for you to continue pursuing this. i wish people would give this the attention it deserves.
i'd note that john and jane doe rarely read minor and compare, contrast, and differentiate it with the 25 citing cases.
as for my doctorate, it's in law. it's a J.D., not a Ph.D. Although in the field of law, a Masters in Law is a higher de gree than a Juris Doctor degree.
so why the insults? what did i do to be called 'skippy' and 'son' and 'scoutie'?
You are right. I was out of line, I apologize.