The author is no lightweight - Dianna Cotter is a Senior at American Military University, a 4.0 Student, the recipient of the Outstanding Student Essay of 2009, a member of Delta Epsilon Tau and Epsilon Pi Phi Academic Fraternities and on the Dean's and President's Lists for academic achievement. She has published at Examiner.com, in American Thinker, Accuracy in Media, and Family Security Matters.
ping
Congratulations on a helluva article, Danae!!!
For those who say 'real lawyers use Lexis and Westlaw', I'd say 'they do when they want to pay for the search or to Shepardize, but even Obama's big-time law firm Perkins Cole uses Justia.com as a reference in articles it publishes.
It's also telling that Justia was previously searchable by the Wayback machine - and those complaining about Minor v. Happersett and the 25 cases that cited it being altered were able to show Wayback Machine screenshots to prove the cases were altered.
However, after founder founder Tim Stanley claimed it was a coding error that caused the problem, and that other cases were affected (without offering any examples), Justia.com added a robots.txt file to all of its pages, which not only prevents future Wayback Machine snapshots of its pages, but also wiped out all previous snapshots from all earlier dates.
This means that Stanley could not show any screenshots to prove that cases other than the 'natural born citizen' cases had been scrubbed, and nobody can use Wayback Machine to prove he was lying.
Convenient, eh?
If you think I sound like a tin-hatted basement dweller, do some research. Stanley has admitted all of this. He just says the 'natural born citizen' cases were scrubbed as the result of a coding error. Draw your own conclusion as to why, out of all the appellate court and U.S. Supreme Court opinions in the world, the 25 accidentally scrubbed just happened to be those with the cite to Minor v. Happersett and 'natural born citizen.' What are the odds.
Attagirl, Dianna Cotter.
Here are two quotes pulled from the Pravda article comments section. Both from the same individual, an Army Cadet. It ought to give us all some concern.
Matt Troillet · Cadet at The U.S. Army
Why is this still going on..? His documentation is valid, or else he wouldn’t have been sworn in, there is no argument at all. If the U.S. government says that the documentation is valid, i’m not going to listen to some back woods sheriff trying to push aside his legal troubles. Especially if the Tea Party has hired him. He has no credibility compared to The Government.
Matt Troillet · Cadet at The U.S. Army
Talk about oxymoron? Just because you are older does not mean you are wiser since you clearly can’t be a “liberal Fascist.” Fascism apposes multiple ideologies including liberalism, and despises all foreign influences which would include a president not born in the u.s. who I am clearly defending. I would Defend any president, I’m a solider first, and a citizen second.
” - - - The American Press is deliberately hiding the evidence published on the internet about this defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of the Constitution of the United States. It is hiding Barack Obama’s Fraud as it has been revealed by a Sheriff in Arizona. The silence of the American press would be unbelievable if it weren’t so blatantly obvious.
It is nearly as egregious as the audacity of Obama’s fraud itself.
Dianna Cotter is a Senior at American Military University, a 4.0 Student, the recipient of the Outstanding Student Essay of 2009, a member of Delta Epsilon Tau and Epsilon Pi Phi Academic Fraternities and on the Dean’s and President’s Lists for academic achievement. She has published at Examiner.com, in American Thinker, Accuracy in Media, and Family Security Matters.”
Thank you Dianna Cotter!