If you want to live in a country without a functioning government, move to Mexico. You might like it. However, as long as you live in America, you are undercutting your own arguement about the necessity of eliminating government.
Informing people and letting them live their lives is not the same as being in a dictatorship or undercommunism. I`m a big believer in allowing people to live the lives they want, but I`m not a big believer in letting them die in ditches, because they honestly cannot take care of themselves as, supposedly anyway, a Ron Paul believer would.
“If you want to live in a country without a functioning government, move to Mexico. You might like it. However, as long as you live in America, you are undercutting your own arguement about the necessity of eliminating government.”
Consider your above statement with your original:
“Everyone should agree that the Government has the right and responsibility to “interfere” with the rights of individuals for the common good at a certain point.”
We live in a nation of laws. Government is recognized as a necessary evil only and is therefore a LIMITED government under the Constitution. Who decides what extra-Constitutional interference the government may make for the common good? Obama???? I hope you enjoy casting your ballot for him again because he is doing exactly what you advise. After all, he is looking out for (in his mind and yours) the common good.
Your arguments are shallow and without merit and are, therefore, your typical Democrat’s understanding of the Constitution and the proper role of government in society.