Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196
Because Duke v Cleland says that the SoS has no jurisdiction over presidential primary ballots.
So she followed one law and disregarded another as it suited her needs. Got it.
447 posted on 03/08/2012 1:40:56 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

She did not ignore a law. The only law she had to rule on was O.C.G.A. §21-2-5. She ruled it did not apply due to previous case law.


453 posted on 03/08/2012 1:47:58 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson