Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196
Showing the BC would not have changed the possible negative outcomes...
I don't see how you could know that so I'll chalk that up to your stating your opinion.
...he would have been off the ballot regardless.

Again, I don't see how you could know that so I'll chalk that up to your stating your opinion.

He was off the ballot until the plaintiffs opened their mouths.
How do you know that? Silence got them nothing and Malihi could have ruled any way he chose, as is evident.

377 posted on 03/08/2012 9:04:08 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36

What other possible negative outcome was there. This was an administrative hearing - the only issue at hand was whether Obama was eligible to be on the ballot.

Only two possible results - on the ballot or off the ballot.

So you tell me - what difference would the BC make? On the ballot or off the ballot are the only two choices.


379 posted on 03/08/2012 9:11:25 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson